Hello,
I wondered if anyone can point me toward descriptions of the CLM carbon cycle setup in the coupled WRF-CLM (sf_surface_physics = 5 in namelist.input)?
Running uncoupled to WRF, the satellite phenology version of CLM needs a roughly 50 model year spinup, while the fully prognostic carbon cycle versions require order 1000 model years.
These spinup times would be computationally expensive for the coupled WRF-CLM, and I'm not finding much of anything in the literature that addresses this.
Any help appreciated!
Tim
--
Timothy W. Hilton
Assistant Project Scientist
Environmental Studies Department
University of California, Santa Cruz